Noble Governance
| Year of publication: | 2024 |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Jouini Mohamed Béchir |
| Categories: | Action Roadmapping, Anticipatory Action Learning, Backcasting, Brainstorming, Causal Layered Analysis, Chaos/Complexity Theory, Citizens Panels, Conferences, Decision Modelling, Design Thinking, Discourse Analysis, Critical Issues Analysis, Environmental Scanning, Essays/Scenario Writing, Expert Panels, Ecosystem Modelling, Focus Groups, Force-Field Analysis, Future-oriented MLP, Futures Wheel, Genius Forecasting, Heuristic Thinking, Horizon Scanning, Interviews, Literature Review, Logic Charts, Morphological Analysis, Pathways/Transitions Analysis, Personal Futures, POP Mapping, Relevance Trees, Robust Advice Framing, Role play/Acting, Scenarios, Science Fictioning, Simulation Gaming, Surveys, SWOT Analysis, TEEPSES / PESTLE / STEEP, TRIZ Inventive Problem Solving, Visioning / Vision building, Weak Signals Analysis, Wild Cards Analysis, Workshops, World Café, Benchmarking, Bibliometrics, Forecasting, Impact Assessment, Indicators, Life Cycle Analysis, Modelling, Patent Analysis, Quantitative scenarios, System Dynamics Modelling, Trend Extrapolation, Time Series Analysis, Actors Indifference Analysis, Cross-Impact Analysis, Delphi Surveys, Field Anomaly Relaxation, Key/Critical technologies, Multi-Criteria Analysis, Polling/Voting |
Its a Theory of ALL
NOBLE GOVERNANCE APPROACH
| Year of publication: | 2023 |
|---|---|
| Authors: | JOUINI MOHAMED BECHIR |
| Categories: | Action Roadmapping, Anticipatory Action Learning, Backcasting, Brainstorming, Causal Layered Analysis, Chaos/Complexity Theory, Citizens Panels, Conferences, Decision Modelling, Design Thinking, Discourse Analysis, Essays/Scenario Writing, Expert Panels, Critical Issues Analysis, Environmental Scanning, Ecosystem Modelling, Focus Groups, Future-oriented MLP, Futures Wheel, Genius Forecasting, Heuristic Thinking, Horizon Scanning, Literature Review, Logic Charts, Morphological Analysis, Personal Futures, POP Mapping, Role play/Acting, Scenarios, Science Fictioning, Surveys, SWOT Analysis, TEEPSES / PESTLE / STEEP, Visioning / Vision building, Wild Cards Analysis, Workshops |
This method is a trajectory of universal thought, an approach based on the following seven combined, inseparable and complexed principles of Universality, Trajectory, System, Knowledge, Freedom, Change, and Dimension. These are necessary knowledge of multi- and transdisciplinary and multi-referential origin, of multidimensional extension (temporal and spatial, unitary and holistic, objective and subjective, determinism and chance, etc.). This approach is endowed with a literary, philosophical and scientific operating mechanism to achieve NOBLE universal ends.
The Future of Forest-based Bioeconomy Areas
| Year of publication: | 2020 |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Rafael Popper, Nina Rilla, Klaus Niemelä, Juha Oksanen, Matthias Deschryvere, Matti Virkkunen, Torsti Loikkanen |
| Permalink to UFO case: | Click here » |
| Categories: | Workshops, Visioning / Vision building, Value Chain/Network Analysis, Surveys, Stakeholder Analysis/MACTOR, POP Mapping, Literature Review, Interviews, Horizon Scanning, Expert Panels, Environmental Scanning, Critical Issues Analysis, Conferences, Brainstorming, Big Data Analytics, Benchmarking, Action Roadmapping |
This VTT Technology report on 'The Future of Forest-based Bioeconomy Areas: Strategic openings in Uruguay and the World by 2050' is the result of a multistakeholder and multi-disciplinary foresight exercise commissioned by the Government of Uruguay in 2018 and completed in 2019. The overall goal of the project was to contribute to Uruguay's National Development Strategy 2050 through the following specific objectives: (1) To identify key global forest-based bioeconomy areas by 2050; (2) To identify needs and gaps in the prioritised FBA in Uruguay; (3) To develop a shared vision for the forest-based bioeconomy in Uruguay by 2050; and (4) To develop a strategic Action Roadmap to achieve the shared vision for the forest-based bioeconomy in Uruguay by 2050. The most important outcomes of the project include: a shared vision for key foresight-based bioeconomy areas (FBAs), as well as five consolidated Action Roadmaps with 511 concrete short-medium-to-long-term actions related to Forest management (FBA1), Mechanical wood processing (FBA2), Fibre-based biomaterial processing (FBA3), Biorefining (FBA4), and Bioenergy (FBA5). In addition, the report provides more detailed recommendations addressing a wide range of research, education, innovation and institutional needs related to the Top 3 Opportunity Pathways (OPs) of the five FBAs. The methodology of the project involved systematic critical issues analysis (drivers, barriers, threats and opportunities), a multi-stakeholder Delphi-like survey, global value network and business news analysis, visioning workshops and action roadmapping. This report is valuable for government, business, research and civil society actors interested in the state-of-the-art and the future of key forest-based bioeconomy areas in the world. Foresight researchers and practitioners will also find interesting methodological approaches, such as the consolidated action roadmaps. Finally, taking worldview perspective, while the project provided an opportunity for foresight knowledge transfer from Europe to Latin America, both the findings and methodology are equally relevant for other world regions and countries concerned with the future of the forest-based bioeconomy. Permalink of this case in the UF Observatory: https://www.universalforesight.com/ufo/all-cases/11111
| Tags: | foresight, bioeconomy, forest, mechanical wood processing, fibre-based biomaterial processing, biorefining, bioenergy |
|---|---|
| Date: | 01.02.2021 |
CASI-F: Common Framework for the Assessment and Management of Sustainable Innovation
| Year of publication: | 2017 |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Rafael Popper, Guillermo Velasco, Monika Popper |
| Permalink to UFO case: | Click here » |
| Categories: | Workshops, Visioning / Vision building, SWOT Analysis, Stakeholder Analysis/MACTOR, Literature Review, Interviews, Horizon Scanning, Critical Issues Analysis, Conferences, Citizens Panels, Action Roadmapping |
This report is the final version of CASI-F: A Common Framework for Assessment and Management of Sustainable Innovation. The framework was informed by a number of preceding tasks and includes inputs from seminars and workshops with a wide range of societal stakeholders, as well as recommendations and feedback gathered from innovators during the mapping of sustainable innovation (SI) initiatives and piloting of CASI-F implementation. The testimonies of stakeholders are therefore presented within the report, in order to further validate the versatility, usefulness and effectiveness of CASI-F, as perceived by its users. The report presents the core of the CASI-F methodology, consisting of five mutually reinforcing sets of protocols and tools (or steps) that constitute the framework, namely: (Step 1) sustainability relevance and scanning; (Step 2) multi-criteria analysis and assessment; (Step 3) critical issue analysis and assessment; (Step 4) multi-level advice management; and (Step 5) action roadmaps management. Although the report marks the final contractual stop of the CASI-F journey, it also highlights the way forward and the potential for a new sustainability assessment and management framework (CASI-F) to thrive beyond the life of the project.
| Tags: | sustainable innovation, assessment, management, public participation, mutual learning, foresight, societal challenges |
|---|---|
| Date: | 07.05.2020 |
ERA Open Advise
| Year of publication: | 2015 |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Rafael Popper, Guillermo Velasco, Jakob Edler, Effie Amanatidou, Ian Miles |
| Permalink to UFO case: | Click here » |
| Categories: | Workshops, Visioning / Vision building, Scenarios, Literature Review, Interviews, Expert Panels, Conferences, Brainstorming |
The ERA Open Advice report and related Policy Brief come at a time when we seek a renewed momentum to support Europe’s way out of the crisis and tackle grand challenges through an improved European Research Area (ERA). They offer a great opportunity to step back and raise a critical wake-up call on the very purpose, shape and ambition of ERA. Here we have captured the essence of ERA stakeholders’ views on rethinking ERA priorities and broadening the agenda. Three key messages and a considerable number of policy issues have emerged: First, the existing ERA priorities are of great importance and should be further pursued. Second, however, there is a concern that the definition of those priorities is too narrow and not flexible enough and thus must be re-visited. Third, and even more important, the debate has led to the identification of new ERA dimensions that have not been captured in the ERA discourse so far, but which deserve more policy attention and integration into the evolving dimensions of the European R&I landscape.
| Tags: | careers, ERA, European Research Area, evaluation, global, governance, innovation, knowledge, Manchester Institute of Innovation Research, MIOIR, research policy, researcher, scenarios, science, society, transfer, University of Manchester, VERA |
|---|---|
| Date: | 06.05.2020 |
Visioning / Vision building
The Future of Forest-based Bioeconomy Areas
Rafael Popper, Nina Rilla, Klaus Niemelä, Juha Oksanen, Matthias Deschryvere, Matti Virkkunen, Torsti Loikkanen
2020
